INTERVENSI YUDISIAL DALAM ISU HUBUNGAN PUSAT–DAERAH: STUDI TERHADAP PRAKTIK MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI
Keywords:Adjudication; Unitary State; National Local Government
The legal issue to be discussed in this article is the involvement of the Constitutional Court in adjudicating issues concerning the relationship between national – local government in general, and the distribution of power to the local government in particular. To be more specific, this article will criticise by delivering a casenote over the Constitutional Court decisions, i.e. Decision Number 87/PUU-XIII/2015, Decision Number 137/PUU-XIII/2015, Decision Number 30/PUU-XIV/2016 and Decision Number 56/PUU-XIV/2016. The casenote will notify the need to a deeper conceptual understanding of the differences between unitary State and federalism principles and its implication in giving prescriptions. This is a response to the Constitutional Court’s judicial opinion which tends weightier to federalism, instead of unitary State principle. According to this situation, it is recommended that the Constitutional Court should not review the constitutionality of laws which contain the legal issues concerning the relationship between national – local government in general, and the distribution of power to the local government in particular. This article uses conceptual and comparative approaches.
Alexander M. Bickel, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics, Yale University Press, New Haven-Connecticut, 1986.
András Sajó and Renáta Uitz, The Constitution of Freedom: An Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017.
Arend Lijphart, Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, Yale University Press, New Haven-Connecticut, 2012.
C.F. Strong, A History of Modern Political Constitutions, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, New York, 1963.
Edward S. Corwin, The Constitution and What It Means Today, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1978.
Hans Kelsen, General Theory of Law and State, Russell & Russell, New York, 1960.
K.C. Wheare, Modern Constitutions, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1975.
Suwoto Mulyosudarmo, Peralihan Kekuasaan: Kajian Teoretis dan Yuridis terhadap Pidato Nawaksara, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 1997.
Umbu Rauta, Konstitusionalitas Pengujian Peraturan Daerah, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta, 2016.
V.C.R.A.C. Crabbe, Legislative Precedents, Cavendish Publishing Ltd., London, 1998.
Abbe R. Gluck and Nicole Huberfeld, What is Federalism in Healthcare For? Stanford Law Review Volume 70 Number 6, 2018.
Anthony J. Bellia, Jr and Bradford R. Clark, The International Law Origins of American Federalism, Columbia Law Review Volume 120 Number 4, 2020.
Edward Rubin, Judicial Review and the Right to Resist, Georgetown Law Journal Volume 97 Number 1, 2008.
Ernest A. Young, The Rehnquist Court’s Two Federalisms, Texas Law Review Volume 83 Number 1, 2004.
Erwin Chemerinsky, The Rehnquist Court & Justice: An Oxymoron, Washington University Journal of Law and Policy Volume 1, 1999.
Erwin Chemerinsky, Reconceptualizing Federalism, New York Law School Law Review Volume 50 Number 3, 2005-2006.
Gillian E. Metzger, Federalism under Obama, William and Mary Law Review Volume 53 Number 2, 2011.
Jesse H. Choper, The Scope of National Power Vis-à-Vis the States: The Dispensability of Judicial Review, Yale Law Journal Volume 86 Number 8, 1977.
John C. Yoo, The Judicial Safeguards of Federalism, Southern California Law Review Volume 70 Number 5, 1997.
Michael C. Dorf, The Relevance of Federal Norms for State Separation of Powers, Roger Williams University Law Review Volume 4 Number 1, 1998.
Robert A. Dahl, Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker, Journal of Public Law Volume 6 Number 2, 1957.
Saikrishna B. Prakash and John C. Yoo, The Origins of Judicial Review, University of Chicago Law Review Volume 70 Number 3, 2003.
Titon Slamet Kurnia, Prediktabilitas Ajudikasi Konstitusional: Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pengujian Undang-Undang, Jurnal Konstitusi Volume 13 Nomor 2, 2016.
Titon Slamet Kurnia, Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Election Court: Refleksi Teoretis, Refleksi Hukum Volume 3 Nomor 1, 2018.
Titon Slamet Kurnia, Normalisasi Hubungan Pusat – Daerah Sesuai Konstitusi Presidensial, Refleksi Hukum Volume 4 Nomor 2, 2020.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 87/PUU-XIII/2015.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 30/PUU-XIV/2016.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 56/PUU-XIV/2016.
Copyright (c) 2021 Veritas et Justitia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
The Journal allow the author(s) to hold the copyright and to retian publishing rights without restrictions.