MEMAKNAI KEKHILAFAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 308 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v9i2.5671Keywords:
judge's oversight; decisions; industrial relation dispute.Abstract
These days, the industrialization era is rapidly developing and has impacted industrial relations disputes that are becoming increasingly complex and unavoidable. In the case of industrial relations disputes, difference in the decision between the first instance and the cassation level (there is no appeal for industrial relations disputes) occurs frequently. As such is the case between Siti Harini and PT Batik Danar Hadi, in which the verdicts of the first instance and cassation (Case Number: 37/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2017/PN.Smg and Case Number: 308 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2018) and the results of the previous first instance decisions (Case Number: 19/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2017/PN.Smg) differed from one another. In Case Number: 37/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2017/PN.Smg, Siti Harini's lawsuit was granted; in Case Number: 308K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/PN.Smg, PT Batik Danar Hadi's cassation application was granted; howeverin Case Number: 19/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2017/PN.Smg, Siti Harini's lawsuit was dismissed. If the lawsuit is filed while the case at hand is still in the middle of examination at the cassation level, it can be said that the suit is too early (premature) and consequently should be declared inadmissible (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard), but in fact it was granted instead. Hence, it can be concluded that there is an error in the judgment making. Conclusively, it can be stated that the implication of an error in the judgment in the first instance creates legal uncertainty and injustice in the decision.
References
Buku:
Abdulkadir M, Hukum Dan Penelitian Hukum, 1st ed., PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2004.
George, R, Teori Sosiologi, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 1992.
Gorda, I, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Widya Kriya Gematama, Denpassar, 1994.
H.L.A. Har, The Concept of Law, p.153, Oxford University, New York, 1988.
Hamzah A, Kamus Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1956.
Harahap Y, Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian Dan Putusan Pengadilan, Cet. Ke-13, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2013.
Henry, C., Black's Law Dictionary Definations of the Term and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, West Publishing Company, St. Paul Minn Ancient and Modern, 1976.
Ismet B, Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Umum, Airlangga University Press, Surabaya, 2004.
Lilik Mulyadi, Pergeseran Perspektif dan Praktek dari Mahkamah Agung Mengenai Putusan, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2009.
Manullang H, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia, Penerbit Bina Media Perintis, Tanjungsari Medan, 2019.
Marzuki Peter M, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta, 2008.
Rumawi, Bagenda, Jiwantara, et.all., Hukum Acara Perdata, Widina Bhakti Persada Bandung, 2021, hlm., 5–24.
Soemitro R, Hukum Dan Masalah Penyelesaian Konflik, Agung Press, Semarang, 1990.
Sri and Murthy, Useful Judgements for Trial Judges, 2018, hlm., 1–48.
Yudha, A, Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Kontrak Komersial, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2010.
Jurnal:
Adam Rigoni, Common-Law Judicial Reasoning and Analogy, Legal Theory, 2014, vol., 20, no. 2, hlm., 133–156.
Ahmad Siboy, The Integration of the Authority of Judicial Institutions in Solving General Election Problems in Indonesia, Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 2021, vol., 29, no. 2, hlm., 237–255.
Alkostar A, Fenomena-Fenomena Paradigmatik Dunia Pengadilan Di Indonesia (Telaah Kritis Terhadap Putusan Sengketa Konsumen), Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, FH. UII, Yogyakarta, 2004, vol., 11, no. 25, hlm., 1–14.
Anad G dan Roro FS, Problematika Upaya Peninjauan Kembali Perkara Perdata Dalam Tata Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata (ADHAPER), 2015, no. 1, hlm., 1–13.
Daire McCormarck, Philip Pettit Republicanism and Labour Law A Defence, International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 2021, vol., 37, no. 4, hlm., 417–450.
DJ Mullan, The Federal Court Act : A Misguided Attempt at Administrative Law Reform ?, The University of Toronto Law Journal, 2015, vol., 23, no. 1, hlm., 14–53.
Fikri S., The Existence of Civil Procedure Law in Religious Court, ed. Rahmawati; Aris, Clinical Reviews & Cases, Parepare: IAIN Parepare Nusantara Press, 2020.
Goran Dominioni, Pieter Desmet, and Louis Visscher, Judges versus Jurors: Biased Attributions in the Courtroom, Cornell International Law Journal, 2020, vol., 52, no. 2, hlm., 235–265.
Gross National and Happiness Pillars, Achievement, Challenges and Recomendations for Judicial Reform, Indonesia Judicial Reform Forum, 2018.
Jeremy Waldron, Judges as Moral Reasoners, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2019, vol., 7, no. 1, hlm., 2–24.
Joep Sonnemans dan Frans Van Dijk, Errors in Judicial Decisions: Experimental Results, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2019, vol., 28, no. 4, hlm., 687–716.
Kelsen H, Introduction to The Problems of Legal Theory, A Translation of The First Edition of The Reine Rechtslehre or Pure Theory of Law, Oxford University Press, New York, 1992.
Kyle Edwards and Sarah Robinson, Labor and Employment Law : A Career Guide, Labor and Employment Law, 2018, vol., 5, no. 329, hlm., 83.
M. Syamsudin, The Failure of the Court to Protect Consumers: A Review of Consumer Dispute Resolution in Indonesia, Journal of Consumer Policy, 2021, vol., 44, no. 1, hlm., 117–130.
Maria Caroline, Studi Kajian Tentang Gugatan Intervensi Dalam Perkara Perdata, Jurnal Verstek, 2020, vol., 8, no. 1, hlm., 55–61.
Muqaddas B, Mengkritisi Asas-Asas Hukum Acara Perdata, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, FH. UII, Yogyakarta, 2002, vol.,9, no. 20, hlm., 18–31.
Muzakki, M, Ratio Decidendi Hakim MA Dalam Menerima Permohonan Peninjauan Kembali Atas Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Perkara Pemalsuan Surat (Analisis TerhadapPutusan MA Nomor 41 PK/PID/2009 Dan Putusan MA Nomor 183 PK/Pid/2010), 2019, hlm., 1–21.
Nur S, Aspek Yuridis Tentang Upaya Hukum Luar Biasa (Peninjauan Kembali) Terhadap Putusan Yang Berkekuatan Tetap, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, 2016, vol., 4, no. 2.
Oktafianto D & Hanafi M, Analisis Kekhilafan Hakim Yang Nyata Sebagai Dasar Pengajuan Peninjauan Kembali Oleh Terpidana Dalam Perkara Penganiayaan Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 57 Pk/Pid/2013), Jurnal Verstek, 2016, vol., 4, no. 1, hlm., 11–21.
Pramono N, Problematika Putusan Hakim Dalam Perkara Pembatalan Perjanjian, Mimbar Hukum, FH UGM, Yogyakarta, 2010, no. 2, hlm., 224–233.
Pratama Dofan H., Pertimbangan Hukum Judex Juris Memutus Perkara Penggelapan Dengan Adanya Dissenting Oppinion (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1427 K/Pid/2014), Jurnal Verstek, 2019,vol., 7, no. 2, hlm., 1–16.
Ryan Hübert, Biased Judgments without Biased Judges: How Legal Institutions Cause Errors, Journal of Politics, 2021, vol., 83, no. 2, hlm., 753–756.
Setyono Y, Tinjauan Novum Dalam Peninjauan Kembali Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 2019, vol., 49, no. 1, hlm., 136–152.
Smith Z, Disparitas Putusan Hakim (Identifikasi Dan Implikasi), Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 2014, hlm., 94.
Soepomo, Hukum Acara Perdata Pengadilan Negeri, Jurnal Antikorupsi, INTEGRITAS, 2020, vol., 6, https://jurnal.kpk.go.id/index.php/integritas/article/view/408.
Sri Redjeki, dkk., The Implication of the Supreme Courts Affirmation Towards Judex Facti Decision in a Final and Binding Judicial Award Which Still Providing a Chance To Perform Legal Action Through Arbitration After the Nullification of the Arbitration Award, Review of International Geographical Education, 2021, vol., 11, hlm., 1459–1468.
Stuart McLennan, The Law as a Barrier to Error Disclosure: A Misguided Focus?, Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care, 2018, vol., 19, hlm., 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tacc.2018.02.002.
Sudikno M, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2007, hlm., 210.
Sudikno, M, Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar. Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2007.
Syprianus Aristeus, Eksekusi Ideal Perkara Perdata Berdasarkan Asas Keadilan Korelasinya Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 2020, vol., 20, no. 3, hlm., 379.
Thomas J. Miceli, Legal Change: Selective Litigation, Judicial Bias, and Precedent, Journal of Legal Studies, 2019, vol., 38, no. 1, hlm., 157–168.
Situs Daring:
Business Law Binus, Ratio Decidendi dan Kaidah Yurisprudensi, Business-law.binus.ac.id, 2 Juni 2023, pukul 21.00 WIB, diakses dari https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2019/03/04/ratio-decidendi-dan-kaidah-yurisprudensi/.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mustika Prabaningrum Kusumawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
The Journal allow the author(s) to hold the copyright and to retian publishing rights without restrictions.
![Creative Commons License](https://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/veritas/management/settings/<a%20rel="license" href="http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https:/i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.)
