Participatory Governance in Multicentric Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26593/copar.v3i2.9658Keywords:
Citizen participation, Co-production, Heterarchical leadership, Multilevel governance, Structural inequalitiesAbstract
Contemporary public administration has shifted from hierarchical, state-centric models toward multilevel and multicentric governance, in which authority is dispersed across governments, markets, civil society, and citizens. While citizen participation and co-production are central to legitimacy, inclusiveness, and public service performance, structural inequalities, power asymmetries, and coordination challenges frequently constrain meaningful influence, producing engagement that is often symbolic rather than substantive. Drawing on postinternationalist theory, this paper conceptualizes governance as a turbulent, fragmented, and overlapping system characterized by distant proximities, where interdependence coexists with unequal access to power. It examines how these dynamics shape citizen participation, highlighting how structural, relational, and digital inequalities mediate the translation of presence into influence. The analysis integrates empirical examples from diverse governance contexts to illustrate the risks of co-optation and agenda capture and identifies drivers and barriers of substantive participation. Practically, the paper offers guidance for public managers, emphasizing heterarchical leadership, adaptive coordination, and the design of participatory mechanisms that ensure inclusiveness, accountability, and measurable public value. By linking theoretical insights on turbulence, fragmegration, and distant proximities with strategies for public administration, the paper reframes citizen engagement not as a bureaucratic add-on, but as a structurally conditioned determinant of legitimacy, innovation, and effectiveness in complex governance systems.
References
Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., & Lema, M. D. (2020). New development: covid-19 as an accelerator of digital transformation in public service delivery. Public Money &Amp; Management, 41(1), 69-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1764206
Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2023). Public administration and politics meet turbulence: The search for robust governance responses. Public Administration, 101(1), 3-22. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12874
Ansell, C., Trondal, J., & Morten, O. (2017). Governance in Turbulent Times. Oxford: Oxford University.
Arkhipov, A.Y. and Yeletsky, A.N. (2021). Modern globalization: development of glocalization and fragmentation of the world economy. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 41 No. 1/2, pp. 224-238. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-03-2020-0076
Arko, B. (2019). Understanding power asymmetry in participatory development spaces: insights from Ghana's decent work programme. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 6(1), 399 404. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2019.1638298
Åström, J. and Karlsson, M. (2020). Trust in citizens and forms of political participation: the view of public managers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58141-1_2
Bannink, D., Sancino, A., & Sorrentino, M. (2024). Governance without we. Wicked problems and collaborative governance. Public Policy and Administration, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767241239863
Bagherzadeh, M., Ghaderi, M., & Fernandez, A. (2021). Coopetition for innovation - the more, the better? An empirical study based on preference disaggregation analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 297(2), 695 708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.06.010
Bellamy, R. (2017). A European republic of sovereign states: sovereignty, republicanism and the European Union. European Journal of Political Theory, 188-209. doi: 10.1177/1474885116654389
Belamghari, M. (2020). The Fragmentation of Identity Formation in the Age of Glocalization. Sage Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020934877
Belletti, G., Salcido, G. T., Scarpellini, P., Mengoni, M., & Marescotti, A. (2024). Multilevel governance in farmers’ markets: a stakeholder analysis in Tuscany. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1401488
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
Bloodgood, E. A., Bourns, J., Lenczner, M., Shibaike, T., Tabet, J., Melvin, A., & Wong, W. H. (2023). Understanding National Nonprofit Data Environments. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 52(2), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221085731
Bradley, S. and Mahmoud, I. (2024). Strategies for co-creation and co-governance in urban contexts: building trust in local communities with limited social structures. Urban Science, 8(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8010009
Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2016). "Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services." In The Handbook of Service Innovation, 75-92. Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-40288-5_6.
Bruun, O. and Rubin, O. (2022). Authoritarian environmentalism—captured collaboration in vietnamese water management. Environmental Management, 71(3), 538-550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01650-7
Cerny, P.G. (Ed.). (2022). Heterarchy in World Politics (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003352617
Cerny, P. G., & Prichard, A. (2017). The new anarchy: Globalisation and fragmentation in world politics. Journal of International Political Theory, 13(3), 378 394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088217713765
Chatterjee, S., Kumar, A. (2024). Geoeconomics, Geopolitics, and the Contemporary International Order: Some Reflections. In: Mishra, O., Sen, S. (eds) Global Political Economy, Geopolitics and International Security. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2231-0_3
Cheung, T. T. T. and Fuller, S. (2022). Rethinking the potential of collaboration for urban climate governance: the case of Hong Kong. Area, 54(3), 408-417. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12781
Chong, A. (2002). The post-international challenge to foreign policy: signposting ‘plus non-state’ politics. Review of International Studies, 28(4), 783–795. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210502007830
Chikvaidze, D. A. (2020). Multilateralism: its past, present and future. In Cadmus (Vol. 4, Issue 2, pp. 127–133 https://doaj.org/article/44f60d8a1aa64af58a690ec70e8f3696
Cumming, G. S. (2016). Heterarchies: reconciling networks and hierarchies. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31(8), 622–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.04.009
Darmais, Fatmawati, Malik, I., & Alyas. (2023). Collaborative governance in preventing drug smuggling in the Nunukan district. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i5.12990
Drori, G. S., Höllerer, M. A., & Walgenbach, P. (2014). Unpacking the glocalization of organization: from term, to theory, to analysis. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1(1), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2014.904205
Dryzek, J. S., & Niemeyer, S. (2006). Reconciling pluralism and consensus as political ideals. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 634 649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00206.x
Eckerd, A. and Heidelberg, R. L. (2019). Administering public participation. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(2), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019871368
Erman, N. and Todorovski, L. (2010). Analyzing the structure of the EGOV conference community. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14799-9_7
Fage‐Butler, A. (2020). Health-related nudging. Communication & Language at Work, 7(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.7146/claw.v7i1.123248
Ferreira, V. (2025). A powerless alternative? Citizen participation, private actors, and corporate dominance in the contested rollout of renewable energy communities in Portugal. Energy Research & Social Science, 129, 104360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104360
Ferguson, Y., & Mansbach, R. (2007). Post internationalism and IR theory. Journal of International Studies, 529-550. doi:10.1177/03058298070350031001
Foley, C. F., Hines, J. R., & Wessel, D. (Eds.). (2021). Global Goliaths: Multinational Corporations in the 21st Century Economy. Brookings Institution Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctv11hpt7b
Foley, M. W., Bronson, A. E., & Campbell, J. (2021). Can the Social Sector Govern? Civil Society, Social Movement Organizations, and Democracy. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 853-866. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13207.
Gebh, S. (2020). The substance of procedures. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 47(1), 22-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453720974732
Gordon, S. (2017). Online communities as agents of change and social movements. PA: IGI Global.
Groenfeldt, D. and Schmidt, J. J. (2013). Ethics and Water Governance. Ecology and Society, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-04629-180114
Guilbaud, A. (2020). Diplomacy by Non-State Actors. In: Balzacq, T., Charillon, F., Ramel, F. (eds) Global Diplomacy. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28786-3_13
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy? (STU-Student edition). Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7t5w5
Hancock, R. (2022). VOIP technology in grassroots politics: Transforming political culture and practice? Journal of Sociology, 60(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833221086331
Hartanti, F. T., Abawajy, J., Chowdhury, M., & Shalannanda, W. (2021). Citizens’ trust measurement in smart government services. IEEE Access, 9, 150663-150676. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3124206
Hillmer-Pegram, K. and Robards, M. D. (2015). Relevance of a Particularly Sensitive Sea Area to the Bering Strait Region: a Policy Analysis Using Resilience-Based Governance Principles. Ecology and Society, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-07081-200126
Hobbs, H. H. (2000). Pondering postinternationalism. New York: State University of New York.
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2001) Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Houtzager, P. P., Acharya, A., Amâncio, J. M., Chowdhury, A., Dowbor, M., & Pande, S. (2020). Social accountability in metropolitan cities: strategies and legacies in delhi and são paulo. Development Policy Review, 39(1), 59-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12481
Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). "Ambiguity, Complexity, and Dynamics in the Management of Collaboration." International Journal of Project Management, 18(3), 163-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00032-4.
Iermakova, O., Kamińska, B., Voicilas, D. M., LAIKO, O., Hetman, O., Забарна, Е., … & Halytsia, I. (2021). Glocalization of regional innovation development. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 43(2), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2021.16
Indama, V. (2022). Digital governance: citizen perceptions and expectations of online public services. Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics, 1(2), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.isslp.1.2.3
Isett, K.R., I.A. Mergel, K. LeRoux, P.A. Mischen, and R.K. Rethemeyer. 2011. Networks in Public Administration Scholarship: Understanding Where We are and Where We Need to Go. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (1): i157–i173.
Iyer, D. K. and Kuriakose, F. (2024). Digital platforms as (dis)enablers of urban co-production: evidence from Bengaluru, India. Urban Planning, 9. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.7262
Karthikeyan, R., Al-Shamaa, N., Kelly, E. J., Henn, P., Shiely, F., Divala, T., … &O’Donoghue, J. (2024). Investigating the characteristics of health-related data collection tools used in randomised controlled trials in low-income and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open, 14(1), e077148. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077148
Karns, M., Mingst, K., & Stiles, K. (2015). In International Organizations. CO: Lynne Rienner.
Kassen, M. (2020). Open data and its peers: understanding promising harbingers from Nordic Europe. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(5), 765-785. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-12-2019-0364
Kaur, H. (2025). Youth Political Mobilization in the Global South: Comparative Study of Online vs Offline Movements. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i04.54648
Kaufmann, D., & Sidney, M. (2020). Toward an urban policy analysis: incorporating participation, multilevel governance, and “Seeing like a city.” PS, Political Science & Politics, 53(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096519001380
Kessa, R., Sadiq, A., & Yeo, J. (2021). The importance of vertical and horizontal collaboration: united states’ response to covid-19 pandemic. Chinese Public Administration Review, 12(1), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/153967542101200105
Khatri, S. K. and Paudel, N. (2025). Barriers and Prospects of Women’s Participation in Local Governments of Nepal. The Himalayan Geographers, 15, 64-82. https://doi.org/10.3126/thg.v15i1.81414
Khanakwa, S. and Mbonigaba, J. (2022). Institutional arrangements for providing hiv and aids services in uganda: a transaction cost economics analysis. Health Services Insights, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329221096046
Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2000). Public Management And Policy Networks: Foundations of a network approach to governance. Public Management, 2(2), 135 158.https://doi.org/10.1080/146166700411201
Kokx, A. and Kempen, R. v. (2010). Dutch urban governance: Multi-level or multi-scalar?. European Urban and Regional Studies, 17(4), 355-369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776409350691
Krieger, N. (2020). Measures of racism, sexism, heterosexism, and gender binarism for health equity research: from structural injustice to embodied harm—an ecosocial analysis. Annual Review of Public Health, 41(1), 37-62. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094017
Leat, D., Seltzer, K., & Stoker, G. (2002). Towards holistic governance: the new reform agenda. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave, 10, 978-1.
Lenz, T. (2021). Interorganizational diffusion in international relations. In Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198823827.001.0001
Lichtarski, J. M., & Piórkowska, K. (2021). Heterarchical Coordination in Inter-organizational Networks: Evidence from the Tourism Industry. Tourism and Hospitality Management, 27(2), 235–253. https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.27.2.1
Liston, V., Harris, C., & O'Toole, M. (2013). Bridging Normative Democratic Theory and Internet Technologies: A Proposal for Scaling Citizen Policy Deliberations. Policy & Internet, 5(4), 462-485. https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.poi349
Lucas, J. and Smith, A. K. (2019). Multilevel policy from the municipal perspective: A pan‐Canadian survey. Canadian Public Administration, 62(2), 270-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12316
Lushka, I. (2025). Digital Transformation in Civil Society: Mapping the Evolving Strategies of Advocacy NGOs in the Western Balkans. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development, 12(2), 28. https://doi.org/10.56345/ijrdv12n2004
Madsen, K. M. and Brix, J. (2024). Building capacity for digital innovation—a game‐study. Creativity and Innovation Management, 34(2), 486-499. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12650
Mallinson, D. J. (2019). Who are your neighbors? The role of ideology and decline of geographic proximity in the diffusion of policy innovations. Policy Studies Journal, 49(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.1235
Martini, E., & Sgambato, M. C. (2025). Digital Inequalities and Access to Technology: Analyzing How Digital Tools Exacerbate or Mitigate Social Inequalities. Societies, 15(11), 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15110318
Maull, H. (2011). World politics in turbulence. Retrieved from library.fes.de: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/ipg/ipg-2011-1/2011-1__03_a_maull.pdf
McGinnis, M. D. (2011). Networks of adjacent action situations in polycentric governance. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00396.x
McNeely, C. L. (2024). Traversing the digital divide in concept and effect: relative interpretations and orientations. Policy &Amp; Internet, 16(2), 214-221. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.409
Mikhasev, T., & Golosov, G. V. (2023). Reluctant cooptation: The legislative recruitment of the private sector into Russia’s dominant party, 2015–2020. Party Politics, 31(1), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231202856
Mickwitz, P., Neij, L., Johansson, M., Benner, M., & Sandin, S. (2021). A theory-based approach to evaluations intended to inform transitions toward sustainability. Evaluation, 27(3), 281-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389021997855
Mikhasev, T. and Golosov, G. V. (2023). Reluctant cooptation: the legislative recruitment of the private sector into Russia’s dominant party, 2015–2020. Party Politics, 31(1), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231202856
Migchelbrink, K. and Walle, S. V. d. (2020). Increasing the cost of participation: red tape and public officials’ attitudes toward public participation. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(3), 644-662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852320942311
Milhaupt, C. J., & Pargendler, M. (n.d.). Governance challenges of listed state- owned enterprises around the world: National experiences and a Framework for reform. Cornell International Law Journal: Vol. 50: No. 3, Article 3. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol50/iss3/3
Moghrabi, I. H. and Sabharwal, M. (2017). The role of the information society in promoting a better and a more democratic governance. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 7(4), 132. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v7i4.12018
Nnenna, U. J., Perpetua, U. I., Nchaga, A. M., Hadijah, T., Mabonga, E., & Nyamboga, T. O. (2024). Impact of digital governance on public service delivery in East Africa. IAA Journal of Arts and Humanities, 11(1), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.59298/iaajah/2024/11.11829.11
Nguyahambi, A. M. and Rugeiyamu, R. (2025). “It is not shrinking, ngos need unlimited freedom”: Government Stance on the Perceived Shrinkage of Civic Space in Tanzania. Journal of Social Innovation and Knowledge, 2(1), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1163/29502683-bja00013
PA, A. R. B., Sitepu, D. S. S. B., Elixabhet, G., Siburian, R., & Adianingsih, Z. R. (2024). Peranan Advokasi LSM Dalam Mendorong Penegakan Hukum dan HAM di Era Reformasi. Journal of Law and Social Society, 1(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.70656/jolasos.v1i2.128 Panke, D., & Stapel, S. (2024). Multi-level governance. In Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (pp. 417–430). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800373747.00028
Passmore, S. R., Kisicki, A., Gilmore‐Bykovskyi, A., Green‐Harris, G., & Edwards, D. F. (2021). “there’s not much we can do…” researcher-level barriers to the inclusion of underrepresented participants in translational research. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.876
Patterson, A. S., Clark, M. A., & Rogers, A. (2024). Network power and mental health policy in post-war Liberia. Health Policy and Planning, 39(5), 486-498. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czae020
Pigola, A., Costa, P. R. d., Mazieri, M. R., & Scafuto, I. C. (2022). Collaborative innovation: a technological perspective. International Journal of Innovation, 10(2), 204-211. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i2.22256
Prichard , A. (2010). Rethinking anarchy and the state in IR theory: the contributions of classical anarchism. Retrieved from University of Bristol: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/spais/migrated/documents/prichard0310.pdf
Ramadoni, R., Suryadin, S., Mustamin, M., & Erham, E. (2025). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pembentukan Undang-undang: Studi terhadap Partisipasi Masyarakat Secara Substansial/Bermakna (Miningful Participation). Sentri Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 4(12), 4314-4327. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v4i12.5152
Ranchordás, S. (2022). Connected but still excluded?. The Cambridge Handbook of Information Technology, Life Sciences and Human Rights, 244-258. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108775038.020
Riggs, W. (2018). Technology, civic engagement and street science. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209383
Rogers, D. (2009). Postinternationalism and small arms control: theory, politics, security. Burlington: Ashgate.
Rosenau, J. N. (1990). Turbulence in world politics: a theory of change and continuity. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Rosenau, J. N. (2003). Dynamics beyond globalization. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Rottmann, S. B. (2023). Forced Migration and the Politics of Belonging: Integration Policy, National Debates and Migrant Strategies. International Migration Review, 59(2), 811 824. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183231195284
Ryan, C. (2012). Co-Production: Option or Obligation? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 72(4), 398-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00780.x.
Saifullah, K., & Ahmad, A. (2020, July 15). The Increasing Influence Of The Non-State Actors In International Politics. https://asce-uok.edu.pk/journal/index.php/JES/article/view/144
Samnakay, N., Alexandra, J., Wyborn, C., & Bender, I. (2024). Climate adaptive water policy in Australia’s Murray Darling basin: soft options or hard commitments? Ecology and Society, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-14578-290101
Saragih, G. M., Putra, R. K., Ishwara, A. S. S., Nugroho, A. W., & Ivory, J. (2025). Comparison of the Principle of Meaningful Participation in the Process of Law Formation in Indonesia, Switzerland, and Sweden. Justisi, 11(3), 889-908. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v11i3.4346
Sherpa, P. and Chepang, B. (2025). Beyond Tokenism: Indigenous Peoples’ Participation in Decision-Making in Community and National Park Governance in Nepal. Journal of Nepalese Studies, 17(1), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.3126/jns.v17i1.88160
Shi, S. (2022). Research on popular participation in chinese rural governance——the case of shunde, guangdong. Academic Journal of Humanities &Amp; Social Sciences, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.25236/ajhss.2022.050212
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2021). "Public Innovation and the Role of Collaboration." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(4), 782-797. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa025.
Sørensen, E., Hendriks, C. M., Hertting, N., & Edelenbos, J. (2020). Political boundary spanning: politicians at the interface between collaborative governance and representative democracy. Policy and Society, 39(4), 530-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1743526
Springman, J., Malesky, E., Right, L., & Wibbels, E. (2022). The Effect of Government Repression on Civil Society: Evidence from Cambodia. International Studies Quarterly, 66(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqac028
Stapper, E. (2021). Private ordering of public processes: how contracts structure participatory processes in urban development in Amsterdam and Hamburg. Urban Studies, 59(9), 1872-1888. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211024144
Su, D., Du, Q., Sohn, D., & Xu, L. (2017). Can high-tech ventures benefit from government guanxi and business guanxi? the moderating effects of environmental turbulence. Sustainability, 9(1), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010142
Syahruddin, S., Jalal, N., Laiyan, D., Saragih, D. P., Oja, H., & Purnama, E. N. (2023). Community adaptation in facing the digital governance. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 49(1), 393-399. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v49i1.9831
Teivainen, T., & Trommer, S. (2016). Representation Beyond the State: Towards Transnational Democratic Non-state Politics. Globalizations, 14(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2016.1160599
Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive GovernanceAdvancing the Paradigm. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199596751.001.0001
Townsend, B., Collin, J., Cullerton, K., Lauber, K., Martin, J., Baum, F., … & Friel, S. (2025). Logics of (dis)engagement: mapping variation in organisational norms and approaches to alcohol, UPF and related industries. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6901425/v1
Trautendorfer, J., Hohensinn, L., & Hilgers, D. (2025). Contrasting information demand and information supply: Digital platforms as intermediaries of Citizen-Government interaction. Information Polity, 30(4), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/15701255251393049
Trondal, J., Pinheiro, R., Keast, R., & Noble, D. (2022). Governing complexity in times of turbulence. In Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800889651.00010
Trondal, J., & Bauer, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the European multilevel administrative order. Capturing variation in the European administrative system. European Political Science Review (forthcoming).
Turcanu, C., Oudheusden, M. V., Abelshausen, B., Schieber, C., Schneider, T., Železnik, N., … & Pölzl-Viol, C. (2020). Stakeholder engagement in radiological protection: Developing theory, practice and guidelines. Radioprotection, 55, S211-S218.https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020036
Ulibarrí, N., Imperial, M. T., Siddiki, S., & Henderson, H. (2023). Drivers and dynamics of collaborative governance in environmental management. Environmental Management, 71(3), 495-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01769-7
Visser, S. and Kreemers, D. (2019). Breaking through boundaries with par – or not? a research project on the facilitation of participatory governance through participatory action research (par). Educational Action Research, 28(3), 345-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2019.1624380
Vivier, E. and Sanchez‐Betancourt, D. (2023). Participatory governance and the capacity to engage: a systems lens. Public Administration and Development, 43(3), 220-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2012
Volk, C. (2019). The problem of sovereignty in globalized times. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 18(3), 716–738. https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872119828010
Widiyaningrum, W. Y. and Riaji, I. A. R. (2023). Collaborative governance on mangrove rehabilitation by indralayang village and pt. pln west java at karang modang. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 1148-1160. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-164-7_106
Xin, G., Esembe, E. E., & Chen, J. (2022). The mixed effects of e‐participation on the dynamic of trust in government: evidence from Cameroon. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 82(1), 69-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12569
Zeemering, E. S. (2016). What are the challenges of multilevel governance for urban sustainability? Evidence from Ottawa and Canada's national capital region. Canadian Public Administration, 59(2), 204-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12167
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dana-Marie Ramjit
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
