Penerapan Model State Capitalism sebagai Strategi Pembangunan Ekonomi Singapura

Authors

  • Jenifer Nanyang Technological University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26593/sentris.v5i1.7621.14-33

Abstract

Since its independence, Singapore has transformed from a developing country into one of the most economically developed ones by implementing state capitalism. State capitalism adopts liberalism and mercantilism to intensify the supervision of government in the midst of economic liberalization. This intrigues further question in regards how Singapore is able to find the common ground between state and business actors' interest through the creation of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) and how the government execute its involvement, this article focuses on the implementation of state capitalism and its impacts on the companies and vital industries’ development. This article analyses the implementation of state capitalism in three periods: pre state capitalism, after independence, and after crisis (1998-2022)

Keywords: state capitalism; State Owned Enterprises; Government Linked Companies

References

Alami & Dixon (2019). State capitalism Redux? Theories, Tensions, Controversies. Competition &

Change 24 (1) DOI:10.1177/1024529419881949.

Ang (2006). Government Ownership and the Performance of Government-Linked Companies: the Case

of Singapore. Journal of Multinational Financial Management 16: 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.mulfin.2005.04.010.

ASEAN. (2021). ASEAN Key Figure. https://www.aseanstats.org/wpcontent/uploads/2021/12/ASEAN-KEY-FIGURES-2021-FINAL-1.pdf.

Chua (2015): State-owned enterprises, state capitalism and social distribution in Singapore. The Pacific

Review. DOI:10.1080/09512748.2015.1022587.

Cummine (2015). How Temasek has Driven Singapore’s Development. East Asia

Forum.https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2015/02/17/how-temasek-has-driven-singaporesdevelopment/.

GIC (2022) 2021/22 Report Highlights.

GIC (2022) 2021/22 Report Highlights. GIC. https://report.gic.com.sg/index.html.

GIC (2022) GIC’s Mandate. GIC. https://www.gic.com.sg/who-we-are/our-governance/.

Goh. C. B.. & Gopinathan. S. (2008). Education in Singapore: Development since 1965. IN B.

Fredriksen & J. P. Tan (Eds.). An African Exploration of East Asian Education. Washington.

DC: The World Bank.

International Trade Administration. (2020). Singapore Manufacturing. International Trade

Administration. https://www.trade.gov/market-intelligence/singapore-manufacturing.

Kim, K (2022) Key features of Indonesia’s state capitalism under Jokowi. Jas (Journal of Asean

Studies): 10(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21512/jas.v10i2.9075.

Nasution (2000) THE ASIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS: Hindsight, Insight and Foresight James M. West,

Review essay: The suboptimal “miracle” of South Korean state capitalism, Bulletin of

Concerned Asian pp. 148-162 (15 pages). https://www.jstor.org/stable/25773625.

Ng, W. J. N (2018). Comparative corporate governance: Why Singapore's Temasek model is not

replicable in China. NYUJ Int'l L. & Pol., 51.

Ng. W. (2018). Comparative corporate governance: why singapore's temasek model is not replicable in

china. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 51(1). 211-250.

PWC. (April 2015). State Owned Enterprises pp. 6-10.

Ramirez & Ling Hui Tan (2003). Singapore Inc. Vs. The Private Sectors: Are Government Linked

Companies Different?. eIMF Library. Diakses dari

https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2003/wp03156.pdf.

Singapore Foreign Ministry (n.d.). Singapore. https://www.mfa.gov.sg/OverseasMission/Xiamen/About-Singapore.

Singapore Government Statistics, “Singapore annual GDP –per industry”,

https://www.singstat.gov.sg/find-data. International Monetary Fund. (n.d.) Singapore Inc Vs. The

Private Sectors. IMF Publication 2021.

Tan (2017). Strategies of PAP in the New Era. National University of Singapore.

https://research.nus.edu.sg/eai/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/11/Vol1No4_SamTan.pdf

Tan (n.d.) Singapore. Inc. Versus the Private Sector.

Tan, et al. (2015). State-Owned Enterprises in Singapore: Historical Insights into a Potential Model for

Reform. NUS Law Working Paper 2015. no. 3 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2580422. pp. 61-65.

Temasek (2022). Temasek Review. https://www.temasek.com.sg/content/dam/temasek-corporate/ourfinancials/investor-library/annual-review/en-tr-thumbnail-and-pdf/Temasek-Review-2022-

Highlights1.pdf

Volgyi (2019). A Successful Model of State capitalism: Singapore. Central European University Press.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7829/j.ctv138wqt7.13.

West (1987). Review essay: The suboptimal “miracle” of South Korean state capitalism. Bulletin of

Concerned Asian Scholars 19:3, 60-71, (1987). DOI: 10.1080/14672715.1987.10409882

Wolfe (1981). MERCANTILISM, LIBERALISM AND KEYNESIANISM: CHANGING FORMS OF

STATE INTERVENTION IN CAPITALIST ECONOMIES. Canadian Journal of Political

and Social Theory/Revue canadienne de theorie politique et sociale Vol. 5, Nos. 1 - 2 (Winter/

Spring, 1981). Diakses dari https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/view/13895/4670.

Published

2024-06-06