Peran Tesla Dalam Transisi Mobil Listrik dan Energi Bersih: Analisis Ekologi Politik

Authors

  • Rachmandio Nadhl Jaenudin Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Raden Maisa Yudono Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26593/sentris.v6i2.8610.80-91

Keywords:

Tesla, Political Ecology, Political Pressure , United States Regulation, Clean Energy

Abstract

Clean energy has become one of the central issues in International Relations as the impacts of climate crisis and environmental degradation become increasingly tangible. The urgency to move away from fossil fuel-based transportation towards electric vehicles is not merely a technological choice, but also part of political dynamics involving multiple actors with competing interests. This study aims to analyze Tesla’s role in the transition to electric vehicles and clean energy in the United States using a political ecology approach, which positions multinational corporations as actors that shape environmental governance. A qualitative instrumental case study design is employed, relying on document studies of government regulations, corporate reports, and academic literature. The findings show that Tesla functions not only as an electric vehicle manufacturer, but also as a form of political pressure contributing to the strengthening of clean energy regulations during Joe Biden’s presidency following regulatory rollbacks under Donald Trump. At the same time, the study reveals critical consequences, particularly regarding the ecological footprint of battery supply chains and the risk of environmental injustice in mineral-producing countries. Political ecology thus helps to demonstrate that the clean energy transition is deeply embedded in power relations and cannot be understood as a neutral, purely technocratic process.

References

Alanazi, F. (2023). Electric vehicles: Benefits, challenges, and potential solutions for widespread

adaptation. Journal of Applied Sciences, 1–23.

Andersen, S. C., & Jakobsen, M. L. F. (2018). Political pressure, conformity pressure and

performance information as drivers of public sector innovation adoption. International Public Management Journal, 21(2), 1–62.

Boateng, D., Bloomer, J., & Morrissey, J. (2023). Where the power lies: Developing a political

ecology framework for just energy transition. Journal of Political Ecology, 30(1), 1–20.

Bryant, R. L., & Bailey, S. (1997). Third world political ecology. London: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd

ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

Demircioglu, M. A., Audretsch, D. B., & Slaper, F. T. (2019). Sources of innovation and innovation

type: Firm-level evidence from the United States. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(6), 1365–1379.

Eckersley, R. (2004). The green state: Rethinking democracy and sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT

Press.

Foley, C. F., Hines, J. R., & Wessel, D. (2021). Multinational corporations in the 21st century

economy. Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy, 1–22.

Forsyth, T. (2003). Critical political ecology: The politics of environmental science. London:

Routledge.

Hans, V. (2020). Multinational corporations – A study. Journal of Global Economics, 1–18.

Kabes, Y. (2020). Kebijakan inovasi di Amerika Serikat. 1–19.

Knuth, S., Behrsin, I., Levenda, A., & McCarthy, J. (2022). New political ecologies of renewable

energy. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 5(4), 997–1013.

Maradin, D., Malnar, A., & Kaštelan, A. (2022). Sustainable and clean energy: The case of Tesla

company.

Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 5(12), 3531–3542.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2022). U.S. Department of Transportation

announces new vehicle fuel economy standards for model year 2024–2026.

Sudeepa, K. (2021). Clean energy: Key to a sustainable future. Geodiversity & Impact on

Environment, 25(3), 14–17.

Tesla. (2018–2022). 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 Tesla impact report. Texas: Tesla.

Tesla Battery Day. (2020). Tesla Battery Day. Texas: Tesla.

The White House. (2017, June 1). Statement by President Trump on the Paris Climate Accord.

Retrieved from Trump White House Archives:

https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/statement-president-trump-paris-climate-accord/

The White House. (2023). FACT SHEET: Biden-Harris Administration announces new standards and

major progress for a made-in-America national network of electric vehicle chargers.

Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2015, December 12). The Paris

Agreement publication. Retrieved from

https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/parisagreement_publication.pdf

United States House of Representatives. (2017). Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Texas: House of

Representatives.

Woo, J. R., Choi, H., & Ahn, J. (2017). Well-to-wheel analysis of greenhouse gas emissions for

electric vehicles based on electricity generation mix: A global perspective. Transportation

Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 340–350.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01