MENGEKSPLORASI DOKTRIN STANDING DI PERADILAN ADMINISTRASI INDONESIA: TAFSIR DAN HASIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25123/hp6dqa52Keywords:
administrative court; legal standing; right to sueAbstract
The authority to bring a claim before Indonesia’s administrative courts originates from the phrase “feeling that his interests have been harmed” in Article 53(1) of the State Administrative Court Act. Because this clause is open‑textured, it must be interpreted to define its exact reach. Using doctrinal legal analysis of court rulings and scholarly commentary on standing, this study concludes that two categories of plaintiffs can sue: (1) individuals or private legal entities that suffer direct losses from government acts or decisions, and (2) qualifying organizations. For an individual or private entity to obtain standing, it must demonstrate (i) a recognizable interest, (ii) a legal connection to the disputed act or decision, and (iii) harm to that interest caused by the government’s unlawful conduct. Organizational standing is available to bodies that satisfy statutory requirements to appear in court and that litigate not for their own interests but for the public purpose they were created to serve. Standing may also be granted when the harm is merely potential, allowing the administrative court to act preventively before actual damage occurs.
References
Buku:
A’an Efendi, Dyah Ochtorina Susanti, dan Sudarsono, Penelitian Hukum Doktrinal dan Nondoktrinal, Jakarta, Litera, 2024.
A’an Efendi dan Sudarsono, Pilar-Pilar Hukum Administrasi, Jakarta, Kencana, 2025.
Philipus M. Hadjon et.al., Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Gadjahmada University Press, 2002.
Indroharto, Usaha Memahami tentang Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Buku II Beracara di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 2005.
S. F. Marbun, Peradilan Administrasi Negara dan Upaya Administratif di Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Liberty, 1997.
Yulius dan Sudarsono, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Ikhtiar Mewujudkan Kebersisteman Hukum Administrasi, Jakarta, Kencana, 2024.
Jurnal:
Aline Van Bever, “Open Norms and the Foundations of Employment Law: A Legal Examination of Hidden Patterns in Employment Relationships”, European Labour Law Journal, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2012.
Ann Woolhandler and Caleb Nelson, “Does History Defeat Standing Doctrine?”, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 120, No. 4, 2004.
Anthony J. Bellia Jr., “The Origins of Article III ‘Arising Under’ Jurisdiction”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 57, No. 2, 2007.
Antonin Scalia, “The Doctrine of Standing as an Essential Element of the Separation of Powers”, Suffolk University Law Review, xvii, 1983.
Bart Jansen et.al., “A Post-Colonial Comparative Critical Legal Study of the Open Norm of Reasonableness and Fairness (or Good Faith) in Dutch and Indonesian Corporate Law”, International and Comparative Corporate Law Journal, Vol. 15, No.1, 2021.
Bradford Mank, “Standing in Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms: Using Economic Injury as a Basis for Standing When Environmental Harm is Difficult to Prove”, Penn State Law Review, Vol. 115, No. 2, 2010.
Bram Akkermans, “Public Policy (Orde Public) A Comparative Analysis of National, Private International Law, and EU Public Policy”, European Property Law Journal, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2019.
Caleb Nelson, “Standing and Remedial Rights in Administrative Law”, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 105, No. 4, 2019.
Charles C. Steincamp, “Citizenship: A Discussion of Environmental Citizen Suits”, Washburn Law Journal, Vol. 39, 1999-2000.
Chris Dent, “A Law Student-Oriented Taxonomy for Research in Law”, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2017.
Clement Guitton, Clement et al., “The Challenge of Open-Texture in Law”, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2024.
Daniel W. Ingersoll, “Impediments to Environmental Justice: The Inequities of the Maryland Standing Doctrine”, University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2006.
Dewi Asimah, Zainal Muttaqin, dan Dewi Kania Sugiharti, “Implementasi Perluasan Kompetensi PTUN dalam Mengadili Tindakan Faktual (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad/OOD)”, Acta Diurnal, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2020.
Dewi Azizah Nur Safitri dan Bambang Santoso, “Perbuatan Melangar Hukum sebagai Dasar Pengajuan Gugatan Class Action di PTUN”, Verstek, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2024.
Ernest A Young, “Standing, Equity, and Injury in Fact”, Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 5, 2022.
F. Andrew Hessick, “Standing, Injury in fact, and Private Right”, Cornell Law Review, Vol. 93, 2008.
F. Andrew Hessick, “Probalistic Standing”, Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 106, No. 1, 2012.
Francisco Benzoni, “Environmental Standing: Who Determines the Value of Other Life?”, Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, Vol. 18, 2008.
Gene R. Nichol Jr., “Causation as a Standing Requirement: The Unprincipled Use of Judicial Restraint”, Kentucky Law Journal, Vol. 69, No. 2, 1980.
Gerald Nels Olson, “Standing to Secure Judicial Review of Administrative Action-A New Direction”, Journal of Air Law and Commerce, Vol. 37, No. 1, 1971.
Harvard Law Review, “Standing in the Way: The Courts’ Escalating Interference in Federal Policymaking”, Harvard Law Review, 136, 2013.
Heather Elliott, “The Functions of Standing”, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2008.
Ikhsan Azhar, “Keberadaan Pihak Ketiga Wujud Keadilan Hukum dalam Gugatan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara”, Jurnal Yudisial, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2021.
Janice J. Tokar, “Administrative Law: Locus Standi in Judicial Review Proceedings”, Manitoba Law Journal, Vol. 14, No. 2, 1984.
Jannick Friss Christensen et.al., “The Norm of Norms in HRM Research: A Review and Suggestions for Future Studies”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 32, 2022.
Joanna Bell, “The Resurgence of Standing in Judicial Review”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2024.
Joshua Hoyt, “Standing, Still? The Evolution of the Doctrine of Standing in the American and Israeli Judiciaries: A Comparative Perspective”, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 53, No. 2, 2020.
Louis L. Jaffle, “Standing to Secure Judicial Review: Private Actions”, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 2, 1961.
Matthew Groves, “The Evolution and Reform of Standing in Australian Administrative Law”, Federal Law Review, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2016.
Michael C. Jensen, William H. Meckling, and Clifford G. Holderness, “Analysis of Alternative Standing Doctrines”, International Review of Law and Economics, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1986.
Oce Madril dan Jery Hasinanda, “Perkembangan Kedudukan Hukum (Legal Standing) dalam Pengujian Administratif di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Uji Materi di Mahkamah Agung”, Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, Vol. 51, No. 4, 2021.
Owen B. Smitherman, “History, Public Rights, and Article III Standing”, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2024.
Rizky Ramadhan Baried, “Pembuktian Potensi Kerugian dalam Gugatan terhadap Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara”, Sasi, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2021.
Roberts E. and J. Dobbin, “The Role of the Citizen in Environmental Enforcement,” Environmental Law Institute, 1992.
Sassan Gholiagha, Anna Holzschieter, Andrea Liese, “Activating Norm Collisions: Interface Conflicts in International Drug Control”, Global Constitutionalism, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2020.
Spyendik Bernadus Blegur, “Asas-Asas Hukum Utama dalam Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara”, Jurnal Hukum Peratun, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2022.
Thomas F. Cotter, “Standing, Nominal Damages, and Nominal Damages “Workarounds” in Intellectual Property Law After TransUnion”, Scholarship Repository University of Minnesota Law School, 2023.
Thomas Linsenmaier, Dennis R. Schmidt, and Kilian Spandler, “On the Meaning(s) of Norms: Ambiguity and Global Governance in Post-Hemonic World”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 47, No. 4, 2021.
Thomas P. Schmidt, “Standing Between Private Parties”, Wisconsin Law Review, 2024.
Tom Zwart, “Comparing Standing Regimes from a Separation of Powers Perspective”, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 4, 2020.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan:
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1986 Nomor 77; Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3344).
Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 35; Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4380).
Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 160; Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5079).
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 292; Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5601).
Situs Daring:
AMO Institute of Sciences, “Open Norm”, https://www.juridischwoordenboek.nl/zoek/open+norm accessed at 22 Dec 2024.
Constitution Annotated, “ArtIII.S2.C1.6.4.2 Concrete Injury”, https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artIII-S2-C1-6-4-2/ALDE_00012997/ accessed at 19 Dec 2024.
Gian Carlo Canaparo, “Why Standing Matters”, The Federalist Society Jun 25, 2021. https://fedsoc.org/commentary/fedsoc-blog/why-standing-matters accessed at 6 Nov 2024.
Legal Information Institute, “Standing Requirement: Overview”, https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-3/section-2/clause-1/standing-requirement-overview accessed at 21 Dec 2024.
Scott R. Anderson, “Revisiting Standing Doctrine: Recent Developments, Policy Concerns, and Possible Solutions”, Governance Studies at Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/BR_Standing_Doctrine_final.pdf accessed at 17 Dec 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 A'an Efendi, Suwardi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
The Journal allow the author(s) to hold the copyright and to retian publishing rights without restrictions.
![Creative Commons License](https://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/veritas/management/settings/<a%20rel="license" href="http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https:/i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.)
