DAMPAK ESG DAN KINERJA KEUANGAN TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN, DIMODERASI KEPEMILIKAN ASING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26593/q0292343Keywords:
Foreign Ownership, Financial Performance, ESG Score, Value of The Firm.Abstract
ESG dimensions and recognizing the strategic role of foreign ownership in shaping market perceptions. This study aims to examine the effect of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores and financial performance on value of the firm, and to assess the moderating role of foreign ownership in Indonesian capital market. The sample consists of 80 publicly listed companies in Indonesia Capital Market that have ESG scores available for the period 2021 to 2023. Firm valuation is measured by Price to Book Value (PBV), while the independent variables include Current Ratio (CR), Debt to Equity Ratio (DER), Return on Assets (ROA), and ESG components: Environmental Score (ENV), Social Score (SOC), and Governance Score (GOV), along with the aggregated ESG Score. The analysis was conducted using EViews-13 and panel data regression models, including both Fixed Effect and Moderated Regression Analysis. The findings indicate that ROA, ENV, SOC, and GOV scores have a positive and significant effect on firm value. Interestingly, the aggregated ESG Score shows a significant negative effect on PBV, suggesting possible distortion when sustainability dimensions are not assessed individually. CR has a negative significant effect, while DER shows a positive significant effect before moderation. After including foreign ownership as a moderating variable, the influence of CR, DER, and ESG Score becomes statistically insignificant, indicating that foreign investors tend to neutralize the effect of liquidity, leverage, and overall ESG disclosures. This study highlights the importance of disaggregating
References
Akbar, S., Shah, S. Z. A., & Saeed, M. (2019). Liquidity and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging market. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(1), 151-161.
Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H. (1986). Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. Journal of Financial Environments, 17(2), 223-249.
Berger, A. N., & Bonaccorsi di Patti, E. (2006). Capital structure and firm performance: A new approach to testing agency theory and an application to the banking industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(4), 1065-1102.
Chari, A., & Henry, P. B. (2008). Firm-specific information and the efficiency of investment. Journal of Financial Environments, 87(3), 636-655.
Dincer, H., & Hacioglu, U. (2013). The effects of capital structure on firm value: Empirical evidence from Turkey. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(10), 40-50.
Douma, S., George, R., & Kabir, R. (2006). Foreign and domestic ownership, business groups, and firm performance: Evidence from a large emerging market. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 637-657.
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1998). Taxes, financing decisions, and firm value. The Journal of Finance, 53(3), 819-843.
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2021). ESG and Financial Performance: Aggregated Evidence from More than 2000 Empirical Studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 11(1), 210-233.
IDX Statistics. www. idx.co.id
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Environments, 3(4), 305-360.
Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697-1724.
Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2019). Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility During the Financial Crisis. The Journal of Finance, 74(4), 1785-1824.
Mitton, T. (2006). Stock market liberalization and operating performance at the firm level. Journal of Financial Environments, 81(3), 625-647.
Mollah, S., & Zaman, M. (2015). Sariah supervision, corporate governance and performance: Conventional vs Islamic banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 58, 418-435.
Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Environments, 5(2), 147-175.
Nguyen, P. A., Kecskés, A., & Mansi, S. (2021). Does Corporate Social Responsibility Create Shareholder Value? The Importance of Long-Term Investors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 122, 105932.
Pham, P. K., & Nguyen, T. P. (2019). The relationship between liquidity and firm value in Vietnam: Evidence from the stock exchange. Journal of Applied Environment Sciences, 14(2), 534-545.
Phuong, N. C., & Hoang, T. V. (2018). Factors affecting firm value in Vietnam: A study of listed firms on the Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange. The Journal of Asian Finance, Environments, and Business, 5(2), 75-84.
Utami, I. S., & Prasetiono. (2016). Corporate governance mechanisms and firm value: A comparative study of listed companies in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 5(2), 32-45.
Setiawati, L P E, Ni Putu Ayu M.M., Kadek I. K. D. (2023). Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan dan Ukuran terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Riset dan E-Jurnal Manajemen Informatika Komputer, Vol. 7, No. 1. Pp. 222-227.
