Perspektif Rusia Tentang Hubungan Internasional Pasca Perang Dingin

Umar Suryadi Bakry

doi:10.26593/jihi.v13i1.2661.75-89

Authors

Umar Suryadi Bakry Universitas Jayabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26593/jihi.v13i1.2661.75-89

Abstract

After the Soviet break-up and the Marxist regime collapsed, many of alternative notions emerged in the academic community in Russia, including alternative ideas in the field of International Relations (IR). A number of Russian IR scholars attempted to reconstruct the theories of IR, not just the IR theories that developed in Russia during the era of Marxism, but also against Western IR theories. Although the post-Cold War aspirations to create a distinct national school of International Relations in Russia, but these efforts are not free from the ideology and political goal that directing and guiding Russian foreign policy. Even, IR scholars in Russia have come to shared with the Russian government in terms of building the IR theories with the Russian characteristics, especially in challenging Western hegemony in the social sciences and international relations. This article tries to elaborate three intellectual traditions of international relations that developed in Russia, namely Westernism, Statism, and Civilizationism. Westernizer IR heavily influenced by Western liberalism, Statism more inspired by the realism, while Civilizationism is more of a hybrid between the constructivism and Russian essentialism.

References

Clover, Charles, “Dream of the Eurasia Heartland”, dalam Foreign Affairs, Vol. 78 No. 2 (1999), hal. 9-13.

Crawford, Robert M.A. dan Darryl S.L. Jarvis (ed.), International Relations –Still an American Social Science: Toward Diversity in International Thought (New York: State University of New York Press, 2001).

Dugin, Alexander, Velikaia voina kontinentov - The Great War of the Continents (Moskow: Arktogeya, 2002).

Duncan, Peter J.S., Russian Messianism: Third Rome, Revolution, Communism and After (London: Routledge, 2000).

Ersen, Emre, “The Rise of Geopolitics in Russia in the Post-Cold War Period”, dalam Turkish Review of Eurasian Studies, Vol 5 No. 2 (2005), hal. 27-61.

Hoffmann, Stanley, “An American Social Science: International Relations”, dalam Daedalus, Vol. 106 No. 3 (1977), pp. 41-60.

Huntington, Samuel, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon and Shuster, 1996).

Jackson, William D., “Imaging Russia in Western International Relations Theory”, dalam http://www.miamioh.edu/cas/files/documents/havighurst/2001/2001-jackson.pdf [Diakses 7 Januari 2017].

Kozyrev, Andrei, “Russia: A Change for Survival”, dalam Foreign Affairs, Vol. 71 No. 2 (1992 ), hal. 10-15.

Lane, David dan Vsevovold Samakhvalov (ed.), The Eurasian Project and Europe: Regional Discountinuities and Geopolitics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).

Laruelle, Marlene (ed.), Russian Nationalism, Foreign Policy, and Identity Debates in Putin’s Russia (Stuttgart: Ibidem Verlag, 2014).

Marten. Kimberly, “Putin’s Choices: Explaining Russian Forein Policy and Intervention in Ukraine”, dalam The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 38 No. 2 (2015), hal. 189-204.

O’Loughlin, John, Gearoid O. Tuathail, dan Vladimir Kolossov, “Russian Geopolitical Culture in the Post-9/11 Era”, dalam http://www.colorado.edu/ibs/intdev-johno/pub/nazi_data/Proteus.html [Diakses 7 Januari 2017].

Omelicheva, Mariya, sebagaimana dikutip George Diepenbrock, “ Ideology, Politics Thwart Creation of Russian School of International Relations”, dalam http://news.ku.edu/2016/09/14/ideology-politics-thwart-creation-russian-school-international-relations [Diakses 7 Januari 2017].

Pantin, Vladimir I., “Problems of contemporary international politics in the programs of leading political parties and movements of Russia”, dalam Social and Political Forces of Russia and the West and Problems of Globalization (Moscow: Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2002), hal. 139-148.

Pursiainen, Christer, Russian Foreign Policy and International Relations Theory (London: Routledge, 2000).

Rangsimaporn, Paradorn, Russian as an Aspiring Great Power in Asia: Perceptions and Policies from Yeltsin to Putin (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).

Ratti, Luca, “Back to the Future? International Relations Theory and NATO-Russia Relations since the end of the Cold War”, dalam International Journal, Vol. 64 No. 2 (2009), hal. 399-422.

Selvaggio, Angie, “Ideas, Identity, and Interests: A Study of US-Russian Relations in the Post Cold War World”, dalam http://www.cla.auburn.edu/alapsa/assets/file/1aselvaggio-pdf [Diakses 5 Januari 2017].

Tsygankov, Andrei P., “Self and Other in International Relations Theory: Learning from Russian Civilizational Debates”, dalam International Studies Review, Vol. 10 No. 04 (2008), hal. 762-775.

Tsygankov, Andrei P. dan Pavel A. Tsygankov, “National Ideology and IR Theory: Three Incarnations of ‘the Russian Idea’”, dalam European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 16 No. 04 (2010), hal. 663-686.

Tsygankov, Andrei P. dan Pavel A. Tsygankov, “Russian Theory of International Relations”, dalam Robert A. Denemark (ed.), International Studies Encyclopedia (Hoboken, NJ:Wiley-Blackwell Publishers, 2010), hal. 6375-6387.

Voeten, Erik, “Putin and Obama clash over International Relations Theory”, dalam The Washington Post, 29 September 2015.

Waever, Ole, “The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations”, dalam International Organization, Vol. 52 No. 4 (1998), pp. 687-727.

Wieclawski, Jacek, “Contemporary Realism and the Foreign Policy of Russian Federation”, dalam International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 2 No. 1 (2011).