Peer Review Process

Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Industri (JRSI) is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the Editor-In-Chief, the Editorial Board, the Reviewer­­­­­ and the Publisher (Universitas Katolik Parahyangan). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Articles submitted to Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Industri will be first reviewed by an assigned editor in terms of its formatting standard and relevance to the scope of the journal. After passing this stage, the editor-in-chief will remove the author’s information from the article then assign 2 reviewers from our Mitra Bestari team (reviewer team) based on their expertise to evaluate the article. In this second stage, the quality of the article will be reviewed within 3 weeks in a double-blind system.

The quality aspects that an author should consider in their work are originality, relevance to the discipline, research methodology, benefit/impact in the practice area and scientific development and writing structure.

Five possible decisions concerning the evaluation stage are accepted with no revision, accepted with minor revision, accepted with major revision, rejected with the likelihood of resubmission, or rejected with no probability of resubmission. An accepted article that needs revision will be re-reviewed by the same reviewers after the author completes and resubmits the revised paper. Evaluation of a revised article will be based on the fulfilment of the previous assessment result. This final evaluation will result in the acceptance or rejection of the article.