Publication Ethics

 

Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Industri (JRSI) is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the Author, the Editor In-Chief, the Editorial Board, the Reviewer­­­­­ and the Publisher (Universitas Katolik Parahyangan). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

The JRSI editorial board establishes the ethics of scientific publications in the Journal of Industrial Systems Engineering to maintain the quality of papers and avoid plagiarism in the publishing process. This publication ethics applies to writers, editors, best partners, and journal managers. This publication ethics refers to the ethical provisions of scientific publications established by the Indonesian Science Institute Research Council (Majelis Profesor Riset) Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications.

 Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JRSI journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is, therefore, important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the reviewer, the publisher and the society.  

Parahyangan Catholic University as publisher of JRSI takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Parahyangan Catholic University and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Authors' Ethics

  1. Reporting; the author must provide information about the process and the results of his research to the editor in an honest, clear and comprehensive manner, and keep the research data well and safely.
  2. Originality and plagiarism; the writer must ensure that the manuscript that has been sent / submitted to the editor is the original text, written by himself, originating from his own ideas and ideas, and not copying the writing or ideas / ideas of others. The author is strictly forbidden to change the reference source quoted to someone else's name. All paper will be checked with similarity software check by JRSI before we publish it.
  3. Repeat shipping; the author must inform that the manuscript sent / submitted to the editor is a text that has not been sent / submitted to another journal / publication publisher. If there is a "redundancy" of sending the manuscript to another publisher, the editor will reject the manuscript sent by the author.
  4. Author status; the author must inform the editor that the author has the competence or qualifications in certain areas of expertise that are in accordance with the field of science published, namely librarianship. The author who sends the manuscript to the editor is the first author (co-author) so that if a problem is found in the process of publishing the manuscript it can be completed immediately.
  5. Wrong writing error; the author must immediately inform the editor if there is an error in the script writing, both the review results and the edits. The writing error includes writing names, affiliations / agencies, quotes, and other writings that can reduce the meaning and significance of the manuscript. If that happens, the author must immediately propose a repair of the manuscript.
  6. Disclosure of conflicts of interest; the author must understand the ethics of scientific publications above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties, so that the text can be processed smoothly and safely.

Editor's Ethics

  1. Publication decision; the editor must ensure the process of reviewing the script as a whole, transparent, objective, fair and wise. This is the basis of the editor in making decisions about a script, rejected or accepted. In this case, the editorial board acts as a script selection team.
  2. Publication information; the editor must ensure that the guidelines for the writing of scripts for the authors and other interested parties can be accessed and read clearly, both printed and electronic versions.
  3. Distribution of peer-reviewed scripts; the editor must ensure the reviewer and manuscript material for the review, as well as inform the provisions and review process of the script clearly to the reviewer.
  4. Objectivity and neutrality; the editor must be objective, neutral and honest in editing the manuscript, regardless of gender, business side, ethnicity, religion, race, class, and nationality of the author.
  5. Confidentiality; The editor must keep every information well, especially related to the author's privacy and the distribution of the manuscript.
  6. Disclosure of conflicts of interest; editors must understand the ethics of scientific publications above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties, so that the process of publishing the script goes smoothly and safely.

Reviewer Ethics

  1. Objectivity and neutrality; The reviewer must be honest, objective, unbiased, independent, and only side with scientific truth. The process of reviewing the script is carried out professionally, regardless of gender, business side, ethnicity, religion, race, class, and author's nationality.
  2. Clarity of reference sources; the reviewer must ensure that the source of the reference / quotation of the manuscript is appropriate and credible (can be accounted for). If errors or irregularities are found in the writing of the reference / quote source, the reviewer must immediately inform the editor to make improvements by the author in accordance with the records of the reviewer.
  3. Peer-review effectiveness; The reviewer must respond to the manuscript that has been sent by the editor and work in accordance with the predetermined peer review (maximum 2 weeks). If you need additional time in reviewing the script, you should immediately report (confirm) to the editorial secretariat.
  4. Disclosure of conflicts of interest; The reviewer must understand the ethics of scientific publications above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties, so that the process of publishing the script goes smoothly and safely.

Journal Manager Ethics

Decision-making; The manager of the journal / editorial board must describe the mission and objectives of the organization, especially those relating to the establishment of journal policies and decisions without any interest.