Supplier Selection Of Upper Arm And Lower Arm Pantograph Jack Using AHP And TOPSIS Methods

Authors

  • Hery Hamdi Azwir President University
  • Fuad Hasan President University
  • Hirawati Oemar President University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26593/jrsi.v9i1.3423.1-10

Abstract

Cost reduction and multi sourcing program is one of the ways used by companies to survive in business competition. Supplier selection process conducted by PT. MTM aims to get suppliers capable of supplying the needs in a sustainable manner with quality products and competitive prices. The company needs a method to select suppliers that can supply upper arm and lower arm components for pantograph jack products. The research is done through analyzing supplier selection process by PT. MTM, examines the criteria used, and then implements the AHP and TOPSIS methods in the process to gain alternative supplier priorities and reduced purchase costs. To speed up data processing, this study utilizes Expert Choice 11 software. The result of analysis using AHP and TOPSIS is two suppliers will supply the components in PT. MTM.

KeywordsAHP, multi sourcing, cost reduction, panthograph jack, supplier, TOPSIS


References

Azwir, H. H. (2017). Pemilihan supplier menggunakan metode analytic network process di PTUnited Tractors Pandu Engineering. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 18(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol18.No2.103-112

Baker, D., Bridges,D., Hunter,R., Johnson,G., Krupa,J.,Murphy,J.,Sorenson,K. . 2002 Guidebook to Decision Making Methods.WSRC-WM-2002-00002, Department of Energy, USA.

Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., & Figueira, J. R. (2016). Mutiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. Volume 1 (Second edition). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

Hanine, M., Boutkhoum, O., Tikniouine, A., & Agouti, T. (2016). Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection. SpringerPlus, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1888-z

Jabbarzadeh, A. (2018). Application of the AHP and TOPSIS in project management. Journal of Project Management, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.jpm.2018.1.001

Karim, R., & Karmaker, C. L. (2016). Machine Selection by AHP and TOPSIS Methods. American Journal of Industrial Engineering, 4(1), 7–13.

Munir, M. (2017). Pemilihan Supplier Sodium Hiroxide Liquid Integrasi Dengan Metode AHP – Topsis. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 17(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol17.No2.62-71

Nilsson, H., Nordström, E.-M., & Öhman, K. (2016). Decision Support for Participatory Forest Planning Using AHP and TOPSIS. Forests, 7(12), 100.

https://doi.org/10.3390/f7050100

Saaty, L Thomas, 1993, “Pengambilan Keputusan Bagi Para Pemimpin”, edisi 1, alih bahasa oleh Liana dan Kirin, Jakarta: Pustaka Binaman Presindo

Sari, D. R., Windarto, A. P., Hartama, D., & Solikhun, S. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Rekomendasi Kelulusan Sidang Skripsi Menggunakan Metode AHP-TOPSIS. Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Komputer, 6(1), 1.

https://doi.org/10.14710/jtsiskom.6.1.2018.1-6

Tzeng, Gwo-Hsiung dan Jih-Jeh Huang.2011. Multiple Attribut Decision Making: Methode & Application. CRC Press, LLC, United States

Weber, Charles A., Current, John R.,Benton W.C.1991.Vendor Selection Criteria and Methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50 PP 2-18, North Holland.

Yildiz, S., & Yildiz, E. (2015). Service Quality Evaluation of Restaurants Using the AHP and TOPSIS Method. Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, 2(2), 9.

Zopounidis, C., & Doumpos, M. (2016). Multiple criteria decision making: Applications in management and engineering. New York, NY: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-30