Life Cycle Assessment dan Life Cycle Cost untuk Serat Kenaf
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26593/jrsi.v9i3.4109.213-224Abstract
Kenaf fiber from the kenaf plant is the excellent raw material for industry because of the various diversified products it produces. To develop sustainable kenaf fiber, information is needed on the strengths and weaknesses of kenaf cultivation systems with respect to productivity and environmental impact. Therefore, a comprehensive environmental and economic impact assessment was conducted from cultivating kenaf to kenaf fiber. The environmental impact assessment uses the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method and economic calculations from the life cycle of kenaf to kenaf fiber to collectors use the Life Cycle Cost (LCC) method. The calculation of environmental impacts is in accordance with the stages of ISO 14040, using a single score assessment. The LCA results show that the treatment stage is the highest contributor of the three groups of impact categories. The highest to the lowest in the impact category group that was influenced by the treatment stage were resources with a value of 21.4 mPt, human health with a value of 8.76 mPt, and ecosystem quality with a value of 1.91 mPt. The cost identified through the LCC is Rp. 6,088,468,333, NVP and B/Cnet are positive. The results of the sensitivity analysis if there is a reduction in production> 6%, the business is still profitable and can be run.References
Ahmad, S., Wong, K. Y., & Ahmad, R. (2019). Life Cycle Assessment for Food Production and Manufacturing: Recent Trends, Global Applications and Future Prospects. Procedia Manufacturing, 34, 49–57.
Akil, H., Zamri, M. H., & Osman, M. R. (2015). Biofiber Reinforcements in Composite Materials, 138–161. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.
Aminah, A., Wong, C. C. & Hashim, G. M. (2006). Production Potential of Kenaf for Forage and Fibre on BRIS Under Smallholder Production Systems. Fourth Technical Review Meeting on the National Kenaf Research Project. Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute: Malaysia.
Benedict, B. A. (2017). Understanding Full Life-Cycle Sustainability Impacts of Energy Alternatives. Energy Procedia, 107, 309–313.
Buyung, R. A. H. F., Pratasis, P. A. K., & Malingkas, G. Y. (2019). Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Akuntansi Universitas Negeri Manado. Jurnal Sipil Statik, 7(11), 1527-1536.
Daddi, T., Nucci, B., & Iraldo a, F. (2017). Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to Measure The Environmental Benefits of Industrial Symbiosis in an Industrial Cluster of SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 157-164.
Dian, N., Partiwi, S. G., & Ciptomulyono, U. (2014). Rancangan Perbaikan Proses Produksi Dengan Menggunakan QFD, LCA dan LCC di PT PG Candi Baru, Sidoarjo. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Manajemen Teknologi XXI, 1–10.
Dreyer, L. C., Niemann, A. L., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2003). Comparison of Three Different LCIA Methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and Eco-indicator 99. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 8(4), 191–200.
Frankl, P., & Rubik, F. (1999). Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) in Business an Overview on Drivers, Applications, Issues And Future Perspectives. Global Nest: The International Journal, 1(3), 185-194.
Fernando, A. L., Duartea, M. A., Vatsanidou, A., & Alexopoulou, E. (2015). Environmental Aspects of Fiber Crops Cultivation and Use. Industrial Crops and Products, 68, 105-115.
Goedkoop, M. & Spriensma, R. (2000) Eco-indicator 99 Manual for Designers. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the 25 Environment, Den Haag.
Hassan, F., Zulkifli, R., Ghazali, M. J., & Azhari, C. H. (2017). Kenaf Fiber Composite in Automotive Industry: An Overview. International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering Information Technology, 7(1), 315-321.
Heliyanto, B., Jumali, Sudjindro, & Sastrosupadi, A. (1998). Respon Berbagai Aksesi Kenaf Terhadap Aluminium Dan Tanah Podsolik Merah Kuning Di Daerah Jorong Kalimantan Selatan. Jurnal Littri, 4(3), 73-78.
Heijungs, R., Guinée, J., Kleijn, R., & Rovers, V. (2007). Bias in Normalization: Causes, Consequences, Detection and Remedies. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 12(4), 211-216.
Imfeld, G., & Vuilleumier, S. (2012). Measuring The Effects of Pesticides on Bacterial Communities in Soil: A Critical Review. European Journal of Soil Biology, 49, 22–30.
Indriani, I., & Widiawati, D. (2013). Eksplorasi Struktur Serat Tanaman Kenaf (Hibiscus Cannabinus L.) Pasa Teknik Tenun ATBM Sebagai Bahan Baku Tekstil. Jurnal Tingkat Sarjana Bidang Senirupa dan Desain, 1, 1-8.
Irawati, D. Y., & Wulandari, L. M. (2019). Life Cycle Assessment Analysis of Kenaf Cultivation in Bonorowo Land, Laren, Lamongan. Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri, 3(2), 89-97.
ISO 14040. (2006). Environmental management. Life Cycle Assessment: Principle and Framework. International Organisation for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland.
ISO 14044. (2006). Environmental management. Life Cycle Assessment: Requirements and Guidelines. International Organisation for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland.
Jeyanthi, S. & Rani, J.J. (2012). Improving Mechanical Properties by Kenaf Natural Long Fiber Reinforced Composite for Automotive Structures. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 15(3), 275-280.
Jonell, M., & Henriksson, P. J. G. (2015). Mangrove–Shrimp Farms in Vietnam Comparing Organic and Conventional Systems Using Life Cycle Assessment. Aquaculture, 447, 66–75.
Kangiden, D. I., Hartati, R. R. S., & Marjani. (1996). Penyaringan Galur-Galur Kenaf (Hibiscus Cannabinus L.) Sebagai Penghasil Serat di Lahan Gambut Kalimantan Barat. Prosiding Simposium Pemuliaan Tanaman IV. PERIPI Komda Jatim. UPN Surabaya. 61 – 66.
Kardiansyah, T., & Sugesty, S. (2014). Karakteristik Pulp Kimia Mekanis Dari Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) Untuk Kertas Lainer. Jurnal Selulosa, 4(1), 37 – 46.
Kunzli, N., Perez, L., Rapp, R. (2010). Air Quality and Health. European Respiratory Society: Lausanne, Switzerland.
Li, Y., Zhang, W., Ma, L., Huang, G., Oenema, O., Zhang, F., & Dou, Z. (2014). An Analysis of China’s Fertilizer Policies: Impacts on the Industry, Food Security, and the Environment. Journal of Environmental Quality, 42(4), 972-981.
Marjani, Sudjindro, & Purwati, R. D. (2009). Daya Hasil Galur-Galur Kenaf di Lahan Podsolik Merah Kuning. Jurnal Littri, 15(2), 53 – 59.
Masykur, F. S., & Puspitasari, C. (2019). Eksplorasi Serat Dan Kain Kenaf Dengan Teknik Tekstil Pada Produk Fesyen. e-Proceeding of Art & Design, 6(3), 4102-4107.
Meiriza, I., Supratman, N. A., & Tatas, F. (2017). Perancangan Kebijakan Maintenance Mesin Vibro Menggunakan Metode Risk Based Maintenance (RBM) dan Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Di PT Perkebunan Nusantara VIII. E-Proceeding of Engineering, 4(2), 2673–2680.
Miettinen, P., & Hamalainen, R. P. (1997). How to Benefit from Decision Analysis in Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). European Journal Of Operational Research, 102, 279-294.
Mohd, H. A. B., Arifin, A., Nasima, J., Hazandy, A. H., & Khalil, A. (2014). Journey of Kenaf in Malaysia: A Review. Scientific Research and Essays, 9(11), 458–470.
Nemecek, T., Dubois, D., Huguenin-Elie, O., & Gaillard, G. (2011). Life Cycle Assessment of Swiss Farming Systems: Integrated And Organic Farming. Agricultural Systems, 104(3), 217-232.
Perez Gil, M., Contreras Moya, A. M., & Domínguez, R. E. (2013). Life Cycle Assessment of The Cogeneration Processes in The Cuban Sugar Industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 41, 222-231.
Petrillo, A., De Felice, F., Jannelli, E., Autorino, C., Minutillo, M., & Lavadera, A. L. (2016). Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis Model for A Stand-Alone Hybrid Renewable Energy System. Renewable Energy, 95, 337–355.
Purnomo, E., Mursyid, A., Syarwani, M., Jumberi, A., Hashidoko, Y., Hasegawa, T., Honma, S., & Osaki, M. (2005). Phosporus Solubilizing Microorganism in The Rhyzhosphere of Local Rice Varities Grown Without Fertilizer on Acid Sulphate Soils. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition, 51(5), 679-681.
Santoso, B. (2014). Teknik Budi Daya Varietas Baru Kenaf Di Lahan Bonorowo, Podsolik Merah Kuning, Dan Gambut. Balai Penelitian Tanaman Tembakau dan Serat: Malang.
Santoso, B., Jamil, A. H., & Machfud, M. (2015). Manfaat Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) Dalam Penyerapan Karbondioksida (CO2). Perspektif, 14(2), 125 – 133.
Sastrosupadi, A. & Santoso, B. (2002). Pengaruh Pupuk Makro dan Mikro di Lahan Gambut Kalimantan Tengah. Laporan Hasil Penelitian. Balittas: Malang.
Singh, J., Kunhikrishnan, A., Bolan, N.S., & Saggar. S. (2013). Impact of Urease Inhibitor on Ammonia and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Temperate Pasture Soil Cores Receiving Urea Fertilizer and Cattle Urine. Science of The Total Environment, 465, 56-63.
Sudjindro. (2012). Inovasi Varietas Unggul Kenaf Untuk Pemberdayaan Lahan Sub Optimal Di Indonesia. Orasi Pengukuhan Profesor Riset Bidang Pemuliaan dan Genetika Tanaman. Jakarta: IAARD Press.
Tahir, P. M., Ahmed, B. A., Saiful Azry, S. O. A., & Ahmed, Z. (2011). Retting Process of Some Bast Plant Fibers and Its Effect on Fiber Quality: A Review. Bio Resources, 6(4), 5260–5281.
Tukker, A. (2000). Life Cycle Assessment as a Tool in Environmental Impact Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 435–456.
Tuomisto, H. L., Hodge, I. D., Riordan, P., & Macdonald, D.W. (2012). Does Organic Farming Reduce Environmental Impacts? A Meta-Analysis of European Research. Journal of Environmental Management, 112, 309-320.
Utari, M., Yasmini, & Edwina, S. (2016). Analisis Kelayakan Finansial Usaha Perkebunan Karet Program EKS UPP TCSDP di Desa Bina Baru Kecamatan Kampar Kiri Tengah Kab. Kampar. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Riau, 3(2), 99–102.
Vinka, E. T. H., Ra´bagob, K. R., Glassnerb, D. A., & Gruberb, P. R. (2003). Applications of Life Cycle Assessment to NatureWorksTM Polylactide (PLA) Production. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 80, 403–419.
Wang, P., Wang, J., Qin, Q., & Wang, H. (2017). Life Cycle Assessment of Magnetized Fly-Ash Compound Fertilizer Production: A Case Study in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73, 706–713.
